Who are you guys?

2008 nissan qashqai 2 for sale



Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

If you need a car by which you could set of for trips, which could contain more luggage. decide to buy the Subaru Forester III. The Nissan Qashqai II is equiped with by 10 liters smaller luggage compartment than the Nissan Qashqai II so probably you would be able to put in the trunk a bit less. When it comes to the trunk also check its width length and height which have notable impact on loading capability (Trunk dimensions of Subaru Forester III - 1,588 mm/863 mm).

The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Subaru Forester III is higher in comparison to this of the Nissan which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 1 kilometer/hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.

In this category it is the Subaru that can carry 13 percent more fuel in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. The average fuel container capacity in the compact SUV class, which is represented by the Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 class (represented by the Nissan) it equals 61 l.

A Boxer installed inside the Subaru Forester III is distinctly better because it can be shorter and lighter and creates less vibrations in relation to straight engine. What is more you should keep in mind its horizontal design results in that a car has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of In-line engine, like the one put inside the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, is that because of its simplicity of construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.

If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Subaru Forester III, which is by 7 percent higher than the Nissan Qashqai II, is better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.

The fuel economy is distinctly to Nissan Qashqai II's advantage. This automobile burns 33 % fewer petrol in the combined cycle in comparison to the Subaru. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Nissan is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Nissan Qashqai II consumes by 25 % less fuel than the average.

The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up 38 % fewer fuel in city traffic in relation to the Subaru. The difference at the level of 4.2 l is quite big in everyday using car. Additionally, during many months it will give huge savings. Also note that presented results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably raised if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.